What is checked
Three sources, in this order: the regulator's register, the operator's own terms, and the cashier as it appears to a visitor. Nothing is taken from another review site, because a review site is a copy of something and the copy is where errors accumulate.
What the method produces is on the front page, where the eight entries sit with the search data, the cashier route and the bonus arithmetic around them. Who is publishing it, and how the site is paid, is on the about page — both of which are worth reading before the table below, because a method is only as good as the person applying it says it is.
| Field | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Licensing body | the register | which authority issued it |
| Register number | the register | that a document existed under that number |
| Entry month | the register | when the current holder's entry is dated |
| Settlement assets | the cashier | what the site will credit directly |
| Verification wording | the operator's terms | what the operator says it may ask for |
| Game types | the site itself | what kind of catalogue it runs |
Six fields, three sources, and a rule that a field with no source is left empty.
What is deliberately absent
Printed
- Everything in the table above.
- Search volumes, labelled as Google keyword data for Kenya.
- Shilling conversions at a stated working rate of about KSh 129 to the dollar.
- Where a value was not confirmed: the words "not read".
Refused
- Payout speeds. No withdrawal was timed here, so no figure is quoted.
- Return-to-player percentages without a citable source.
- Ratings, scores, stars and rankings.
- Operator bonus headlines detached from the terms governing them.
- Any claim that anyone here played at these sites.
The asset count, and why it is the number printed
Of everything checkable about a crypto casino, the count of settlement assets is the one most likely to affect a Kenyan player and least likely to be advertised. A cashier that already holds the coin bought at the exchange credits it directly; one that does not converts it at a rate it sets, producing a balance slightly smaller than the transfer with nothing announcing why.
| Operator | Assets | Status of that figure |
|---|---|---|
| Rakebit | 15 | read in the cashier |
| Wild.io | 12 | read in the cashier |
| Metaspins | 8 | read in the cashier |
| DuckDice | 10 | read in the cashier |
| Bitsler | — | not read |
| Coins.Game | — | not read |
| BetFury | — | not read |
| BitStarz | — | not read |
4 of 8 confirmed. The rest are printed as gaps, which is the honest state of this catalogue rather than an omission to be quietly filled.
How to test this page
Take any entry from the catalogue, copy its register number, and search the relevant regulator's register for it. It takes about two minutes and it answers a question no amount of writing can: whether this site checked or copied.
The same test applied elsewhere is the most useful habit available on this subject. Follow one licence claim and one numerical claim from any page about crypto casinos to their sources. Where neither leads anywhere, the rest of that page was produced the same way.